Detect & prevent revenue anomalies across quote-to-cash.

Revenue leakage is the gap between what your business should have billed and collected and what it actually did. It happens at every stage of quote-to-cash: quotes priced outside policy, usage that never reached an invoice, contracts that changed while billing did not, renewals that repriced incorrectly, and payments that failed without recovery.

MGI Research reports that 42% of companies experience revenue leakage, typically 3 to 7% of top-line revenue each year. At $500M ARR, that is $15M to $35M a year moving through process gaps your systems were never built to catch.

A dashboard shows you data and waits for someone to notice. Agentic revenue assurance means the system monitors revenue across every stage, finds the exception, traces it to the field and system that caused it, calculates the dollar impact, creates the evidence record, and routes it to an owner. No report has to be requested for any of that to happen.

xfactrs does this through Ray, its agent, running continuously across CRM, CPQ, contracts, billing, invoicing, payments and the GL. A dashboard tells you after close. Agentic assurance tells you while there is still time to reissue the invoice.

No. xfactrs runs on top of the systems you already have and validates the data flowing between them. BlackLine reconciles what the GL says. xfactrs checks that what billing sent to the GL was right in the first place. Your ERP records revenue. xfactrs confirms what gets recorded matches what was contracted, delivered, billed and collected.

You keep your stack. xfactrs covers the gap between the systems in it.

Finance owns the outcome, usually the Controller, Chief Accounting Officer or CFO, since they carry the reported number. Billing operations or revenue operations owns the operational connection, and IT validates the integration. Budget typically sits with the CFO.

The exceptions themselves route to whoever owns the control that caught them, which is often outside finance. That is the point: the fix belongs where the error originated.

Yes. Both standards are supported, which matters for businesses reporting under IFRS 15 in Europe and ANZ, and for groups running dual reporting across a US parent and international entities.

The practical benefit is in reconciliation. A revenue timing difference that is correct under the standard should never be flagged as a loss, and the control points are built to tell those two situations apart.

Connection setup takes two to three weeks across a standard stack. First anomalies typically surface within 15 days of systems going live, because the 500+ control points ship with the platform rather than being written during implementation.

The 15-Day Challenge is built around that timeline: connect one quote-to-cash system, and we show you a real exception from your own data with the root cause and dollar impact attached.

That leakage is happening in your business, with one concrete example from your own systems. It does not produce a total leakage figure, and any vendor promising one in 15 days is estimating rather than measuring.

One verified exception, traced to its source, is usually enough. Finance leaders accept the industry benchmark and assume it applies to someone else. A single real finding from their own data ends that conversation faster than any statistic.