Skip to content
Reconciliation Assurance

Your books should already agree before close begins.

Reconciliation Assurance continuously validates revenue across CRM, CPQ, contracts, billing, usage, invoicing, payments, and the GL. AI agents check every system pair as transactions happen, so by quarter end you already hold the matches, the exceptions, the root cause, and the audit trail.

6 pairs
Reconciled continuously, not at period end
70%
Faster reconciliation
Days
To root cause, not weeks
Zero
Quarter-end surprises
Reconciliation status Live · Q3 · Day 2 of 3
Contract ↔ Billing142 records checked✓ Aligned
Usage ↔ BillingTechStream · 2,500 units$3,750 open
Billing ↔ RevenueASC 606 timing validated✓ Aligned
Revenue ↔ GL87 journals matched✓ Aligned
Invoice ↔ Cashall payments applied✓ Aligned
Billing ↔ GL120 seats provisioned, unbilled$36K open
4 of 6 pairs fully aligned$39.7K open · 2 exceptions assigned
The shift

Most teams reconcile after the period. By then the data is cold.

The same reconciliation files get rebuilt every quarter, the same differences appear, and the same investigation starts. Reconciliation Assurance moves the work from quarter end to the moment a transaction happens.

How it works today

A quarter-end investigation

  • The quarter closes. Finance pulls billing from the billing system, revenue from the rev rec system, and balances from the ERP.
  • The team rebuilds reconciliation files in Excel. Differences appear.
  • The questions start: timing, recognized but not billed, billed but not posted, a contract amendment, a credit, usage billed wrong.
  • Emails go to RevOps, Billing, IT, and sometimes Sales Ops.
  • Two to three weeks to find root cause. Auditors are already asking questions.
  • Finance ends up spending more time explaining revenue than protecting it.
With Reconciliation Assurance

A daily monitoring activity

  • Agents reconcile every system pair as transactions happen, not at period end.
  • Every divergence arrives with its own root cause, owner, and dollar impact.
  • By quarter end finance already holds the reconciliation status, exception list, root cause, resolution status, and audit trail.
  • Close becomes a confirmation of what finance already knows.
  • Audit becomes a validation exercise, not a discovery exercise.
  • The team spends its time on the variances that matter, not on rebuilding spreadsheets.

The difference is timing. Caught the day it happens, a mismatch is a correction. Caught at quarter end, the same mismatch is a write-off.

What the agents reconcile

Six system pairs. Reconciled continuously. Each with its own agent.

Every pair has a dedicated reconciliation agent backed by domain control points. The agent runs the match continuously, explains every divergence in finance terms, and escalates only the exceptions that need a person. No spreadsheets. No waiting for period end.

01
Contract ↔ Billing
Are we billing what was sold, contracted, and provisioned?
Example: contract for 1,000 units, system provisioned 1,200, billing charged for 950. Revenue and margin both leaking.Margin + revenue exposure
02
Usage ↔ Billing
Does metered usage match what was actually billed?
Example: 50,000 API calls consumed, 47,500 captured by billing. 2,500 calls never invoiced.$3,750 unbilled
03
Billing ↔ Revenue
Does billed revenue match what is recognized under ASC 606 and IFRS 15?
Example: invoice raised, revenue deferred on the wrong schedule. The period is misstated before close even starts.Recognition timing risk
04
Revenue ↔ GL
Does recognized revenue tie cleanly to the general ledger?
Example: revenue recognized in the rev system, then an integration failure stops it posting to the GL. The ledger reads short.Reporting misstatement
05
Invoice ↔ Cash
Is every invoice collected and applied to the right account?
Example: payment received but applied to the wrong invoice. AR is overstated and DSO looks worse than it is.AR and DSO distortion
06
Billing ↔ GL
Does what was billed actually land in the ledger?
Example: invoices generated for 120 provisioned seats, a posting failure leaves them out of the GL.$36K under-reported

When all six agree, the number is trustworthy. When one diverges, finance knows which pair, by how much, and why within minutes, not after a three-week investigation.

At enterprise scale

Reconciliation health across the whole book, on any day of the quarter.

One view of every pair, every open variance, and the dollars under review. Not a quarter-end snapshot, a continuously updated picture finance can act on today.

Reconciliation overview · $1.2B revenue bookAcross CRM, CPQ, contracts, billing, usage, invoicing, payments, ERP and GL
Continuously monitored
99.3%
Records reconciled
across all six pairs
14
Open variances
all assigned, root cause known
$4.2M
Under review
of $1.2B book
1.4 days
Mean time to root cause
was 18 days
100%
Evidence auto-generated
audit ready
Contract ↔ Billing99.6%
Usage ↔ Billing97.8%
Billing ↔ Revenue99.9%
Revenue ↔ GL100%
Invoice ↔ Cash99.4%
Billing ↔ GL98.1%
70%
Faster reconciliation cycle
14→3 days
Reduction in days to close
Zero
Quarter-end surprises for the controller
Reconciliation Assurance

See your books reconcile themselves in two weeks.

We connect to your billing, revenue, ERP, and GL, put an agent on all six reconciliation pairs, and show you the variances you are carrying right now, with root cause and dollar impact attached.

SOC 2 Type II certified Deploy in hours, not months Built by Q2C and finance experts

FAQs on Reconciliation Assurance

What is reconciliation assurance in a subscription business?

Reconciliation assurance is the continuous validation of revenue data across every system pair in the quote-to-cash stack. In subscription businesses, revenue flows through CRM, CPQ, contracts, billing, usage, invoicing, payments, and GL. Reconciliation assurance checks each system pair automatically as transactions happen, so mismatches are caught and explained the day they occur rather than weeks later at period end.

Which system pairs does xfactrs reconcile?

xfactrs runs dedicated agents across six pairs: Contract to Billing, Usage to Billing, Billing to Revenue, Revenue to GL, Invoice to Cash, and Billing to GL. Each agent checks alignment continuously, explains every divergence in finance terms, and assigns root cause and dollar impact without requiring a manual investigation.

How is this different from BlackLine or our existing reconciliation tool?

xfactrs sits upstream of reconciliation tools like BlackLine. It assures the data flowing into those tools rather than replacing them. A reconciliation platform catches that two numbers do not match. xfactrs tells you why they do not match, which transaction caused it, and what the financial impact is, so your team spends time resolving the right exceptions rather than tracking down the source.

How much faster does reconciliation actually get?

Teams using xfactrs typically see a 70% reduction in reconciliation cycle time. The main driver is timing: a mismatch caught the day it happens takes minutes to resolve. The same mismatch found at quarter end requires emails to RevOps, Billing, IT, and sometimes Sales, followed by a weeks-long investigation. Reconciliation Assurance moves the work from quarter end to the moment the transaction occurs.

Does xfactrs handle ASC 606 and IFRS 15 reconciliation?

Yes. The Billing to Revenue pair specifically validates that billed revenue is recognized on the correct schedule under ASC 606 and IFRS 15. If an invoice is raised but revenue is deferred on the wrong schedule, xfactrs flags the recognition timing risk before close begins rather than after the period is already misstated.